Apples and oranges, Fox

. Even if Ferrari was faced with the same finacial statements that lead Wiedeking to give go-ahead on developing the Cayenne, they wouldn't and likely couldn't. There are few auto makers that need as much 'attention' every month mechanically :roll: . But, if they ever get past that Ferrari 'mystique... err, mechanical uniqueness', a new management team in 10 years could see it beneficial to capitalize on the most popular line of vehicles on the planet. I'm not saying that Ferrari will do it someday. Just that they could. Not likely though.
Back to the Cayenne. There is little reason for people to hate this idea... Other than it is wavering from Porsche's vaunted history as a sports car company. But if you look closely at the Cayenne, it is more a sports car than 99% of anything non-SUV out there

. Actually, how many sports cars can you name that will match the Cayenne Turbo's, 4.8 0-60, and 165 (claimed) top speed? For 2003 model cars available in the US, you should be able to count them on both hands. It's numbers are staggering even for a car. And it's performance will be typical Porsche. 4.5 liter, 32-valve V-8. 450 HP, 460 ft. lbs. torque. And the running numbers that I listed above. All wheel drive, with a 6-speed tiptronic. The only thing that keeps this thing from running with the top exotics, is its 5,000 pound SUV stature. The biggest drawbacks that I see, are that it is straight-up ugly (most SUV's are), and at 90K for the Turbo, only the Hummer compares in cost. On second thought, maybe I will keep our Sub, and put that wad of $$$ into the Speedster!?!
