First off - viper is not a sports car. It is a poorly designed chasis (yes, it is unstable and has unimpressive handling numbers - shamed by 4 seaters at half the price), and has a tuned up truck motor dating back forever that uses pushrods, I am sorry, pushrods belong in lawn tractors. Corvette lays decent claim. What is impressive about 500hp from 8.3L? not a whole lot. The mustang cobra employs DOHC and a roots s/c - along with a few other tricks - the end result - the power comes on low and strong - nearing peak torque by 2,000 - not dropping off till past 5,500 - peak horsepower is at 6,000. Redline 6,500. Cost: $35,000. Only a tad slower than viper (1/2 second to 60?). Just by using a smaller s/c pully, you could increase horsepower over 500 as boost is set at a resonable 8 psi currently. The Lotus Esprit V8 makes 350hp from 3.5L - and suffers turbo lag. Just because it has a back seat doesn't make it not a sports car. I am not saying that the 4.6 S/C is the greatest thing every, but in the scheme of american sports car engines, this is one of the most advanced and available engines. It is based on archetecture introduced in 1997 - the engines in viper and corvette directly trace their designs and archetecture to engines introduced in the mid to late fifties. Maybe if Chrysler and GM would build somewhat modern engines for their sports cars, they would be more competitive. Corvette is already a very good sports car. Viper - has its niche - for people who thrive on cubic inches. Mustang Cobra is (and with a highly modified suspension and body torsion resistance - it is hardly the platform the debuted in '7

is arguably the most modern in its engineering. If viper had the specific output of cobra - it would make over 700 horsepower. How is that for engineering?
__________________
"The car is the closest we will ever come to creating something that is truly alive"
-Sir William Lyons