as far as i am concerned nobody has even tried to appeal to the logical part of my argument. i mentioned that if anyone could show me statistics of that car being better than any other i would humbly accept correction.
now tell me what has 4ws done for that car? numbers anyone?
what has the varying downforce done for that car? numbers?
awd is definately a given advantage and worth the weight
but does all that account for 3800+lbs.?
i can understand if own this car and your on this site that you dont want anybody giving the thumbs down to your car.
speed is relative therefore what one thinks is fast is based on ones previous experiences.
ok fox here we go(i like the roman numeral point listing ill respond to each in that manner):
I: i didnt say that it couldnt reach a good top end or that it couldnt haddle. i just said that it was the worst in its class, which is the nsx and the skyline gtr?
II: are you a lying pubscent teen? i didnt think so. that would be the only way i wouldve destroyed zeal. i knew an adult who knew what he was talking about wouldnt get defensive and insecure(not saying you are or s/he did but just taking the extra step in diplomacy).
III. how much to
porsches weigh? and do porsches break 160? o so then its not really a problem for them.
IV. this was probably your weekest argument and a horrible analogy. airbags? turbos?. airbags arent needed since they are in a carbon fiber shell. and turbos? isnt that against regulation? forced induction is artificial displacement that weighs a lot less. turbo f1 cars would have an advantage with exception to the lag. f1 cars dont have awd because they dont need it they have no problems coming out of turns with a few g's in the rain. i wouldve thought that wouldve been obvious. the last little choppy bit of this point: the 4ws prelude was slower, handled worse(but it felt like it handled tighter) than the prelude with out 4ws.
V. but we arent talking about audis we are talking about japanese cars in the 3000gt's class. either way you buy the parts and tune the car your self hence brains and money.
VI. eleven years ago (correct me if im wrong about the date) this was high-tech. eleven years before that what was high-tech? and was that better than the 3000gt?
you hate ricers and i can completely sympathize with that. they make me look bad. the 3000gt is just another rice rocket and it is not the best in its class. when did i ever say my car was fast? ever? more modern? what are you talking about? tagent much?