Thread: 3000GT Vr-4
View Single Post
Old 12-01-06, 04:25 AM   #71
mehb
 
Join Date: 12-01-06
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0mehb is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bleh
numbers.
0-60: worst
topspeed: if the z was not limited (which only takes a few dolars) worst
lateral acc.: the only thing the 3000gt barely has over the nsx(show me the g's in both directions though)
1/4 mile: tied with the z
coclusion: over all the 3000gt is the worst of these three

any more comments Shayon201, thepolarfoxqx, vorros?

first those number are for 91 to 93 vr4.the 94 up is higher.
0 to 60:4.8
1/4 mile 13.5
60 to 0 110 feet (the best in class) even better than r34.
lateral acc 94g
and i don't think the z lateral acc is 99g.
now tell me why it's the worst in class? better than r32 gtr ?yes, better than 300zx? hell yes ,better than rx7? yes ,better than nsx?not in cornerring but for the rest yes ,better than supra? maybe in same class.
the 300zx lateral acc is 86g that's close to a suv,so don't even compare vr4 to that car.the active spoilers have been proven that will make big diffrence in high speed ,and cornering as well.the AWS will make diffrence.it reduse the understeer alot.
this video proves so maythings
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...2e018336bf.htm
mehb is offline   Reply With Quote