Quote:
| Originally Posted by bleh the s2000 quality is much higher. wait till you sychros take a crap, or your toe angle gets screwy and your tires start to feather, or your interior door handles break. the average person will always think the s2000 is slow, cus they want low end torque. you have to take it to 9 to appreciate it.
one of my buddies used to have a z and it performed decently, but he got rid of it within less than a year and lost a chunk in the process. im not saying its a crappy car, i loved driving it, but i would never buy one. however, given the finances, i would be a proud owner of an s2000. its a matter of preference. |
What Z was the new 350? How did he drive it, trying to bust it all over. Please is not a Honda but it is a Nissan, they both make exellent cars & quality to be honest is comparable. Now i drag race a lot and believe me I would get a 350 over the S2000. Only droping some weight out of it and it becomes really fast. So far I have only lost one race with an STI souped up pushing 350 to the wheels and I have race it with SRT's , S2000's, Porshe's ( got kicked but no for to much )
RX-8 's and only lost that race with the STI ( great car by the way
) Remember my friend is not what you drive, is how you drive it also, and so far no complaints, although I could not say much about the S2000 since I haven't tested to the fullest but in a drag I would take the Z. Just a coment peace
Also the Z is what some people call Japanese muscle, I will go with it, low end torque, yeah
